Could it cause immeasurable harm over time? I think people need to be educated to the fact that marijuana is not a drug. Marijuana is an herb and a flower. God put it here. If He put it here and He wants it to grow, what gives the government the right to say that God is wrong? Thanks for the insight, Nelly! Man, as an imperfect being, will always find a way to abuse substances and create our own reality to escape from the truth. More harm could be done to society as a whole by fully legalizing marijuana usage than regulating its classification.
With Big Data, the government doesn’t need to know the “why” behind anything.
So… what does that mean? Scientists have conclusive or substantial evidence that Cannabinoids in marijuana can have a favorable effect on pain management. That is, it can reduce pain levels in some people. This is also the most cited reason for requesting a medical marijuana script. Cannabinoids can also treat muscle spasms associated with multiple sclerosis as well as nausea associated with Chemotherapy.
Regular marijuana smokers may develop chronic bronchitis Children of mothers who used cannabis while pregnant may have lower birthrates Marijuana users experience an increased risk of developing schizophrenia, especially in those already at risk Marijuana can increase the risk of a motor vehicle accident Children are slightly more likely to consume cannabis accidentally in states with legal access Cannabis is not connected to any in creased lung, head, or neck cancers associated with smoking, but chronic or frequent users may develop a higher risk for certain testicular cancers how odd!
Cannabis is connected to a slight increase in the risk for depression and social anxiety disorder. There is moderate evidence that Lastly, there is limited evidence showing A connection that marijuana use is related to impaired academic achievement Use of cannabis increases the risk of complications or the requirement of neonatal care Smoking marijuana has any anti-inflammatory effects Smoking marijuana can trigger a heart attack.
There was insufficient evidence altogether regarding cannabis increasing the risk of heart attack. Comments I think people need to be educated to the fact that marijuana is not a drug. They never intended the fiscal-cliff scenario. They never heard of the debt ceiling or sequestration or automatic tax increases. If they had known of such things, perhaps they would not have designed a system in which it is so easy to block action.
- The Wind-Sphere Ship (The What Man Hath Wrought Series Book 1).
- ISBN 13: 9781467980920.
- Officer Body-Slams High School Girl (Video)!
- Site Index.
- It's clear this government doesn't value the arts in schools.
- Tutankhamen: Amenism, Atenism and Egyptian Monotheism.
- The Supernatural by Lyman Abbott (1899).
In an interview, Mansbridge said that the Framers definitely feared tyranny by government. They followed in a line of political thought, going back to Thomas Aquinas and further back to Aristotle, suggesting that the main problem of organizing a government was the potential for a tyrannical king or king-like dictator. And she agreed with my hypothesis that the Framers were also anxious to reassure those in the country, who felt they had just risked everything to overthrow the tyrant King George and the tyranny of the British Parliament.
And those are among the reasons for the many choke or veto points they built into the Constitution. What can be done? Mansbridge is not optimistic, especially in an area of partisan polarization, that the United States can address structural problems that are embedded in the Constitution, which is so difficult to amend. The permanent campaign has destroyed the capacity to compromise… A lot of voters think refusing to negotiate is a principled position. You can imagine that in 10 years or more, if things continue the way they are going, a candidate will be able to make the case for a basic change in the way elected officials behave.
When an issue is of obvious importance and benefit to all, legislation moves smooth as a gravy sandwich. The gridlock and filibustering we have today is the direct result of ideologues at both end of the spectrum doing their thing; the system is doing exactly and precisely what the framers intended.
If there truly is a fiscal cliff in our path, and if that cliff will truly do lasting harm to our economy, it will get steered around. The last time we refused to deal with a genuinely serious issue by continued kicking the proverbial can down the road, the result was, first, Fort Sumter, and eventually, after , had died, Appomattox.
As Mansbridge suggests, inaction is, in fact, a choice. Choosing not to decide is, in the end, a decision, and one that can have far-reaching consequences. The humbleness that should accompany the win with an insignificant margin is lost to the idea that a win of a few votes is a a strong mandate.theausopoty.tk
Why government doesn’t work
I suppose that is why the polls in Massachuseetts are running 2 to 1 against him—they have such fond memories of the halcyon days of his leadership. There is really no comparison between being a governor and the president of the US. A large part of the US budget deals with defense and foreign policy that most governors are clueless about. The problem, as I see it, is that the way our election system is set up encourages politicians to pursue the hardened partisan bases; i. This is a problem because it leads politicians to prioritize catering to the minority fringe rather than the moderate voters who make up most of the country.
Ergo the politicians sent to Washington are skewed toward more extreme views. A system that sends more extreme politicians to Congress results in representatives who are further apart on the issues and less likely to compromise. The result is the gridlock you see today. The way it works is that all citizens are required to vote or else face a fine equivalent to a parking ticket. In practice, this raises voter turnout to more than 90 percent of all voters.
When more people turn out to vote, more moderate voters cast their ballots and send more moderate politicians to Washington to represent them, aka people who are actually open to compromise.
Would this be a difficult measure to pass? But less so than a total overhaul of the current government system to minimize all the various choke points. Would it solve all our governmental problems? But I believe it would address the major issue of how to encourage more cooperation within our government.
- Sexy Challenge - Checking The Undercarriage (Sexy Challenges Book 25).
- The dangers of government that doesn’t get things done | MinnPost.
- Limited Government Definition.
- Historically speaking…;
- Sunday working.
Especially when the U. First, read the Constitution of the United States of America. The minorities Senate Republicans in this case effectively have veto power, and they have used it. The democrats have repeatedly show a desire for compromise.
Obama wasted a precious two years trying to get some kind of health care compromise out of the republicans and ended up passing the legislation without a singe republican vote. Here in MN we just witnessed several breathtaking examples of unipolar bullying by the republicans.
Government doesn't listen
The paralysis is by and large the product of an American electorate acting stupidly. The two parties responded to this electoral environment with greater and greater magnitudes of mediocrity. The critical difference with the republican party is that this era of anti intellectualism a 4th great awakening brought Evangelical thinkers into power so when they won elections they moved policy and action further and further away from reality. The way out if for the electorate to demand action. I think people are beginning to see, despite Democratic campaign incompetence, that this stalemate is the product of Republican extremism.